#advertising boycott

#advertising boycott

Judge Reed O'Connor recused himself from the X Corp. lawsuit, now assigned to Judge Ed Kinkeade, amidst allegations of advertiser collusion against X.

The case centers on X Corp.'s claims of an antitrust violation due to a coordinated advertising boycott after Musk's acquisition.

The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) initiative is ending operations after being sued for allegedly contributing to an advertising boycott after Elon Musk's purchase of a company.

Elon Musk and X filed a lawsuit against advertisers colluding to boycott their social media platform.

Brands refusing to advertise on Musk's social media site led to an economic harm lawsuit, accusing them of collusion and violating antitrust law.

Elon Musk's X accuses major advertisers of antitrust violations for conspiring to boycott platform post-acquisition, impacting ad business recovery.

Elon Musk's social media platform X sued advertisers for a massive boycott, claiming revenue loss and antitrust violations.

Elon Musk's platform sued advertisers for conspiring to withhold ad revenue despite meeting GARM standards.

X's CEO, Linda Yaccarino, leads a lawsuit against advertisers for an alleged antitrust violation.

X, formerly Twitter, may lose up to $75 million in advertising revenue as companies pull their ads from the platform due to pro-Nazi content.

Over 200 companies, including Airbnb, Amazon, Coca-Cola, and Microsoft, have already discontinued or are considering discontinuing advertising on X.

Elon Musk acknowledged the loss in ad revenue and blamed advertisers and Media Matters for the boycott.

Advertisers suspend advertising on X after Elon Musk endorses antisemitic post.

Apple, IBM, and other major advertisers pause advertising on X.